Syllogistic Logic with Comparative Adjectives

نویسنده

  • Lawrence S. Moss
چکیده

This paper adds comparative adjectives to the known systems of syllogistic logic. The comparatives are interpreted by transitive and irreflexive relations. The main point is to obtain sound and complete axiomatizations of the logics.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Intersecting Adjectives in Syllogistic Logic

The goal of natural logic is to present and study logical systems for reasoning with sentences of (or which are reasonably close to) ordinary language. This paper explores simple systems of natural logic which make use of intersecting adjectives; these are adjectives whose interpretation does not vary with the noun they modify. Our project in this paper is to take one of the simplest syllogisti...

متن کامل

All Brutes are Subhuman: Aristotle and Ockham on Private Negation

The mediaeval logic of Aristotelian privation, represented by Ockham’sexposition of All A is non-P as All S is of a type T that is naturally P and no S isP, is critically evaluated as an account of privative negation. It is argued thatthere are two senses of privative negation: (1) an intensifier (as in subhuman),the inverse of Neoplatonic hypernegation (superhuman), which is st...

متن کامل

A Reconstruction of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic

Ever since Łukasiewicz, it has been opinio communis that Aristotle’s modal syllogistic is incomprehensible due to its many faults and inconsistencies, and that there is no hope of finding a single consistent formal model for it. The aim of this paper is to disprove these claims by giving such a model. My main points shall be, first, that Aristotle’s syllogistic is a pure term logic that does no...

متن کامل

Pr ecis of Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic

Aristotle was the founder of modal logic. In his Prior Analytics, he developed a complex system of modal syllogistic. While influential, this system has been disputed since antiquity and is today widely regarded as incoherent or inconsistent. In view of this, Aristotle’s Modal Syllogistic explores the prospects for understanding the modal syllogistic as a coherent and consistent system of modal...

متن کامل

Comparative Logic as an Approach to Comparison in Natural Language

Montague grammarians cl^T" that tlic logical analysis 01 language skccdicd in standard textbooks of first order logic is too coarse to be appropriate to such natural languages as English. In the following we shall defend the opposite view—at least as far as a very narrow fragment of English is concerned, traditional logical analysis is perfectly adequate provided we are ready to pay the price o...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of Logic, Language and Information

دوره 20  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011